Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2019 07:09:19 -0600 From: LuKreme <kremels@kreme.com> To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Is IPV6 option still necessary? Message-ID: <2E9007CC-E0C3-4E50-A21C-96658AEC5F91@kreme.com> In-Reply-To: <cf57a0e4-25af-d44e-bfbf-b02e1a4a8347@quip.cz> References: <cf57a0e4-25af-d44e-bfbf-b02e1a4a8347@quip.cz>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Oct 11, 2019, at 06:44, Miroslav Lachman <000.fbsd@quip.cz> wrote: >=20 > =EF=BB=BFLuKreme wrote on 2019/10/11 00:23: >> On Oct 10, 2019, at 10:01, Lars Liedtke <liedtke@punkt.de> wrote: >>> Why not just make building in IPv6 support the default, and introduce a >>> flag if someone really needs or wants to build without that support? >> Because it adds to the load of testing. If you really need it, build from= source. > Building official packages with IPv6 is OK. Removing existing options from= ports and saying "build from source" is ... stupid. How many ports do you maintain? Are you willing to test and patch ports for removing ipv6 on each new versio= n?
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?2E9007CC-E0C3-4E50-A21C-96658AEC5F91>