Date: Sat, 3 Oct 2009 20:23:46 +0200 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Gy=F6rgy_Vilmos?= <vilmos.gyorgy@gmail.com> To: Francisco Reyes <lists@stringsutils.com> Cc: Attilio Rao <attilio@freebsd.org>, freebsd-performance@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Performance evaluation of PostgreSQL's historic releases Message-ID: <dac6660e0910031123k5c3f3a28j72ad282a4b31efac@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <cone.1254507983.700820.39647.1000@zoraida.natserv.net> References: <dac6660e0909290040k5e0ac9a0mafe4e484802f8429@mail.gmail.com> <3bbf2fe10909290811p6ac49f7fxaf7e7d4bf631da4c@mail.gmail.com> <dac6660e0909301106t2591be23t675eb5a2aa0b6bd@mail.gmail.com> <cone.1254507983.700820.39647.1000@zoraida.natserv.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
2009/10/2 Francisco Reyes <lists@stringsutils.com> > Gy=F6rgy Vilmos writes: > > BTW, even on one thread, Linux (2.6.31) performs much better, better mea= ns >> here 790 TPS vs. 580... >> > > What test did you use to meassure TPS? > That is a pretty big difference. > > sysbench --=20 http://suckit.blog.hu/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?dac6660e0910031123k5c3f3a28j72ad282a4b31efac>