Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2005 12:26:13 -0500 From: Dan Nelson <dnelson@allantgroup.com> To: Lei Sun <lei.sun@gmail.com> Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: oversized httpd process? Message-ID: <20050824172613.GC88693@dan.emsphone.com> In-Reply-To: <d396fddf050824100345063d98@mail.gmail.com> References: <d396fddf05082400304744960f@mail.gmail.com> <20050824143133.GA88693@dan.emsphone.com> <d396fddf050824100345063d98@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In the last episode (Aug 24), Lei Sun said: > Now that I think about it, I did install the eaccelerator for php, > and configured it to take 128Mb for eaccelerator.shm_size. It also > appears that when I reboot the machine A without pointing my browser > to it once, the httpd processes are quite small. BUT... > > Even with the 2 php application that I installed (phpmyadmin, > mediawiki), I don't think there should be that much caching going on. > Since if I add the total size of the 2 application together, they > won't even hit 20MB. In other words, my understanding would be: even > if eaccelerator wants to cache them all, eaccelerator wouldn't be > able to find that much stuff to cache, and it would always be less > than 20MB. Apparently eaccellerator mmaps the entire shm segment whether it is currently using it or not. -- Dan Nelson dnelson@allantgroup.com
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050824172613.GC88693>