Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2009 09:12:48 +0200 From: VANHULLEBUS Yvan <vanhu@FreeBSD.org> To: Scott Ullrich <sullrich@gmail.com> Cc: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" <bzeeb-lists@lists.zabbadoz.net>, freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: NATT patch and FreeBSD's setkey Message-ID: <20090415071247.GA78251@zeninc.net> In-Reply-To: <d5992baf0904141324g6a0e9678k4754f3ac6c808589@mail.gmail.com> References: <85c4b1850902170448p7a59d50bt6bdaa89aa01c51d7@mail.gmail.com> <20090217143425.GA58591@zeninc.net> <20090217143409.J53478@maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net> <20090226141138.GA91564@zeninc.net> <d5992baf0904141324g6a0e9678k4754f3ac6c808589@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 04:24:44PM -0400, Scott Ullrich wrote: > On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 10:11 AM, VANHULLEBUS Yvan <vanhu@freebsd.org> wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 02:41:41PM +0000, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote: > [snip] > >> We have about 3 months left to get that patch in for 8; ideally 6 > >> weeks. Can you update the nat-t patch in a way as discussed here > >> before so that the extra address is in etc. and we can move forward? > > > > Done, new version is available here: > > http://people.freebsd.org/~vanhu/NAT-T/experimental/patch-FreeBSD-TRUNK-NATT-pfkey-clean-2009-02-26.diff > > Hello, Hi. > We recently tested this patch on a up to date current as of a couple > hours ago and it seems to break all outgoing UDP traffic (DNS > included). There's a conflict between INP_ESPINUDP* and other INP_* commited since 2009-02-26. > Has anyone else experienced this issue? Backing the patch out of our > pfSense patch roster cleared up the problem. > > Is there a newer patch available by chance? Actually, not, because there are no bits left in inp_flags, so we are actually looking for another location to put them. Yvan.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20090415071247.GA78251>