Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2006 17:04:25 -0600 (CST) From: chris@i13i.com To: "illoai@gmail.com" <illoai@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, Cody Holland <cholland@redmoonbroadband.com> Subject: Re: FreeBSD 6.X Updating Source Message-ID: <54699.212.39.168.67.1140649465.squirrel@webmail.i13i.com> In-Reply-To: <d7195cff0602221328r3f7a35bfm25bbda83f37ae08c@mail.gmail.com> References: <4B3EE484EEA4F344BBB62F83164899866A9CF8@corpsrv.RedMoon.local> <d7195cff0602221328r3f7a35bfm25bbda83f37ae08c@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
The difference between RELENG_6 and RELENG_6_[0-1] is one is a development branch which releases are based off and RELENG_6_0 is the stable version of the released code which only gets security fixes commited to it. As bother are considred stable code compared to current STABLE sometimes breaks due to new features so i recomend you cvsup RELENG_6_0 then when 6.1-REL comes out cvsup RELENG_6_1 Regards, Chris > On 2/22/06, Cody Holland <cholland@redmoonbroadband.com> wrote: >> . . . running FreeBSD 6.1-PRERELEASE #0. >> . . . RELENG_6 tag, >> Is a prerelease considered stable, or am I doing something wrong? > > Naming conventions. Nothing else. For the brief life > of a -PRERELEASE, that's what -STABLE is. There's > also a tendancy to not commit major changes during > this period. > >> . . .Please do not copy it for >> any purpose, or disclose its contents to any other person. > > Sorry about that. I'll try to avoid being legally bound by > agreements I didn't sign in the future. > > -- > -- > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?54699.212.39.168.67.1140649465.squirrel>