Date: Wed, 03 Oct 2007 11:55:45 -0500 From: Stephen Montgomery-Smith <stephen@math.missouri.edu> To: Harald Servat <redcrash@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: papi port, fortran issues Message-ID: <4703C991.8060408@math.missouri.edu> In-Reply-To: <d825e0270710030048s3a1633fco9d4d096843aaf5b2@mail.gmail.com> References: <d825e0270710030048s3a1633fco9d4d096843aaf5b2@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Harald Servat wrote:
> Hello to everybody,
>
> recently I received an automated mail about a port I'm maintaining. Such
> mail includes a full report (which is good in order to review the problems
> ;) ) of the port build on amd64/freebsd7.
> The program needs fortran compiler, and looking at the report, I see that
> fortran compiler is installed, however the compiler name is gfortran42 (due
> to the gcc package is 4.2 I think). As the configure of the ported program
> does not look for gfortran42 explicitly (but looks for gfortran, g77,
> fortran, xlf and so) it fails when trying to compile the fortran code.
>
> So two questions arise to my mind,
> and which is the good way to solve this? Maybe should I look for
> gfortran42 (and change it for every compiler version), or should gcc package
> install a softlink from gfortran to gfortran42 --or the latest installed
> version--?
> why this doesn't happen on i386/freebsd7?
>
> Regards,
I think adding a line to your Makefile like this might fix it:
CONFIGURE_ENV= CPPFLAGS="${CPPFLAGS}" F77="${F77}"
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4703C991.8060408>