Date: Wed, 03 Nov 2004 16:27:04 -0600 From: "W. D." <WD@US-Webmasters.com> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Cc: terry tyson <beebum@gmail.com> Subject: Re: *BSD is considered the safest OS Message-ID: <5.1.0.14.2.20041103162600.1032e3f0@209.152.117.178> In-Reply-To: <dad842a90411031150539c3900@mail.gmail.com> References: <41892752.4010406@broadpark.no> <20041102120139.U70884@kheops.speedy.net.pe> <20041102173545.M67685@wcborstel.nl> <41892752.4010406@broadpark.no>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
At 13:50 11/3/2004, terry tyson wrote: >On Wed, 03 Nov 2004 19:45:38 +0100, Henrik W Lund ><henrik.w.lund@broadpark.no> wrote: >>=20 >> Actually, I read somewhere that UNIX systems are more vulnerable to >> buffer overflows than Windows systems. Can't confirm the validity of >> this, though. >>=20 > >Buffer overflows are already being addressed. >http://www.openbsd.org/papers/auug04/ >http://kerneltrap.org/node.php?id=3D573 >http://news.com.com/2100-1002-996584.html >--=20 >Terry What version of FreeBSD will incorporate these techniques? Start Here to Find It Fast!=99 ->= http://www.US-Webmasters.com/best-start-page/ $8.77 Domain Names -> http://domains.us-webmasters.com/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?5.1.0.14.2.20041103162600.1032e3f0>