Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2018 14:20:53 +0100 From: Steven Hartland <killing@multiplay.co.uk> To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ZFS (ARC) performance regression in r321610 Message-ID: <93ad65ca-e1d5-0275-b8c2-bc8a55e66e0c@multiplay.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <dc784684-7f43-9080-8de6-015148fc529e@FreeBSD.org> References: <20180827154727.80f92fff9bbc931b37928d43@yamagi.org> <3c6f8c96-6ac9-7257-c8c0-8be2063a7c19@FreeBSD.org> <20180827182723.cd8ec6bac6448793b25ef91c@yamagi.org> <20180828105048.d5a4133c8a932eff900bd758@yamagi.org> <20180828110543.7cc7fa65a0e04e29a06a32b1@yamagi.org> <dc784684-7f43-9080-8de6-015148fc529e@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 28/08/2018 14:10, Lev Serebryakov wrote:
> On 28.08.2018 12:05, Yamagi Burmeister wrote:
>
>
>>> ZFS on Linux exposes zfs_abd_scatter_enabled through a module
>>> parameter. What about turning it into a sysctl? Something like this:
>> Ups, there sneaked an unrelated edit into the patch. New version here:
> I think, you need to create Phabricator review ("change") and push it
> HARD, or patch will be lost and never go to sources :-(
>
I'll try and pick this up if no else gets to it first.
Regards
Steve
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?93ad65ca-e1d5-0275-b8c2-bc8a55e66e0c>