Date: Sat, 22 Dec 2018 13:02:52 +0100 From: Kurt Jaeger <pi@freebsd.org> To: Mel Pilgrim <list_freebsd@bluerosetech.com> Cc: FreeBSD Ports ML <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>, ports-secteam@freebsd.org, portmgr@freebsd.org, "Timur I. Bakeyev" <timur@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Bug 233749 - net/samba47, net/samba48: Merge ports r486043 to 2018Q4 (Fixes several vulnerabilities) Message-ID: <20181222120252.GD84895@home.opsec.eu> In-Reply-To: <e915ef82-02ce-0579-2649-5e16f6f34635@bluerosetech.com> References: <1b5e5e0a-f492-5ec0-a70c-dc34d1d26c01@bluerosetech.com> <e915ef82-02ce-0579-2649-5e16f6f34635@bluerosetech.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi! > On 2018-12-12 19:19, Mel Pilgrim wrote: > > Would someone work on ports/233749, please? The original security fix > > was committed to head 15 days ago, but has yet to be merged to quarterly. > > I realize it's the holidays, but this is a security fix for a major port. > Or is it the plan to let this go unfixed in 2018Q4? Hoping about a plan is unfortunatly expecting a bit too much right now, with all the updates, holidays etc going on. I guess it's not easy to estimate if the MFH would fit right in. After checking the commits to samba47, I guess something like this might work: /usr/ports/Tools/scripts/mfh 2018Q4 486043 -- pi@opsec.eu +49 171 3101372 2 years to go !
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20181222120252.GD84895>