Date: Wed, 05 Nov 2014 07:26:01 -0500 From: Lowell Gilbert <freebsd-ports-local@be-well.ilk.org> To: "Chris H" <bsd-lists@bsdforge.com> Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Reducing the size of the ports tree (brainstorm v2) Message-ID: <44ioitx292.fsf@lowell-desk.lan> In-Reply-To: <ecb8554cb4fe5b25be718648fb5ee7d8@ultimatedns.net> (Chris H.'s message of "Tue, 04 Nov 2014 20:26:47 -0800") References: <20141031185621.GC15967@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> <54573B31.7080809@gmx.de> <20141103212438.0893c3dc@kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org> <14d0c0b9ee9ca31877d43a3c29481717@ultimatedns.net> <alpine.BSF.2.11.1411041608200.91469@wonkity.com> <4b76467a41c12811b0bd9b6ab13906c8@ultimatedns.net> <alpine.BSF.2.11.1411042022410.99894@wonkity.com> <ecb8554cb4fe5b25be718648fb5ee7d8@ultimatedns.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
"Chris H" <bsd-lists@bsdforge.com> writes: > Difficult to tell for sure. I haven't examined the [UFS/ZFS] source > to know for sure. Be valuable info. :) Reading source not required: start with "man newfs"; note blocksize and frag-size.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?44ioitx292.fsf>