Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 26 Feb 2021 09:56:04 +0100
From:      infoomatic <infoomatic@gmx.at>
To:        Andriy Gapon <avg@FreeBSD.org>, freebsd-fs@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: FreeBSD 13 BETA3 zfs mount failed
Message-ID:  <47e949d3-2fc4-f581-e8a8-a707a23406ab@gmx.at>
In-Reply-To: <f1221ad8-61c8-f2e9-2faf-2c6e910403b0@FreeBSD.org>
References:  <92cd2855-8765-234e-3763-3811da269704@gmx.at> <f1221ad8-61c8-f2e9-2faf-2c6e910403b0@FreeBSD.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 25.02.21 22:38, Andriy Gapon wrote:
> Just to try to narrow down, does the same procedure work if datasets are not
> encrypted?

It works as expected without encryption: I sent data to an unencrypted
dataset on linux and could import the pool and read/write the files of
that dataset on FreeBSD BETA3.

Another scenario: I did the same setup as in my previous mail on BETA3,
sent some snapshots to the encrypted dataset on BETA3. I then could
however import the the pool in Linux as read-only (feature
com.delphix:log_spacemap was missing), could also load-key and read the
encrypted dataset.





Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?47e949d3-2fc4-f581-e8a8-a707a23406ab>