Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 14 May 2006 17:43:25 +0100
From:      Aren Olvalde Tyr <aren.tyr@gawab.com>
To:        freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Cvsup verses Portsnap
Message-ID:  <200605141743.38475.aren.tyr@gawab.com>
In-Reply-To: <f2c91f770605131913t7c69b4a5p8e34a3f98ef2a714@mail.gmail.com>
References:  <000301c676b3$9f398b90$6603a8c0@zeus> <200605132330.08793.aren.tyr@gawab.com> <f2c91f770605131913t7c69b4a5p8e34a3f98ef2a714@mail.gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

[-- Attachment #1 --]
> # portsnap fetch update    ;)
>
> Assuming, of course, you've already extracted the tree...

Ahh, of course, nice.

The FreeBSD ports system + portsnap + portupgrade is a truly awesome 
combination, much better than any other package management system I've ever 
used on other systems.

I'm currently working on a little port configuration tool to make tweaking all 
the port Make knobs more convenient.

Aren.

[-- Attachment #2 --]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQBEZ146oWGxb6IQ4B4RAkwKAJ4z1oFid37Rcj01n51g45nFLaZYTwCgwqhm
1R4RBOhHmcS1E1zCl6dqmXY=
=z6ok
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200605141743.38475.aren.tyr>