Date: Sat, 14 Apr 2018 18:25:17 +0000 From: Carmel NY <carmel_ny@outlook.com> To: FreeBSD <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Conflicts due to renamed KDE4 ports Message-ID: <BN6PR2001MB1730E9F82788E58F850F5E4880B20@BN6PR2001MB1730.namprd20.prod.outlook.com> In-Reply-To: <f5e5fc69-c3e5-fbfc-485c-01ed18b0cbbe@freebsd.org> References: <a9ce1576-a254-4e79-3e50-b90d49827a1e@freebsd.org> <BN6PR2001MB1730DAE90491E510EDED691F80B20@BN6PR2001MB1730.namprd20.prod.outlook.com> <20180414165707.GA83446@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <f5e5fc69-c3e5-fbfc-485c-01ed18b0cbbe@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, 14 Apr 2018 19:53:49 +0200, Stefan Esser stated: >Yes, but I put literally hundreds of hours of effort into >understanding portmaster (which is one monolythic 4000 line >shell script with global state that recursively invokes itself >to implement local state, with hundreds of instances forked in >practice) and implementing FLAVOR support. Good luck. A 4,000+ line shell script is, IMHO, ridiculous. --=20 Carmel
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?BN6PR2001MB1730E9F82788E58F850F5E4880B20>