Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 09:14:26 -0500 From: Kris Moore <kris@pcbsd.com> To: Jeff Colter <jeff.colter@gmail.com> Cc: peterjeremy@optushome.com.au, freebsd-openoffice@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Problem with openoffice 2.3.1 on freebsd... Message-ID: <478B6E42.3040303@pcbsd.com> In-Reply-To: <fb5891a50801112059m788408b3h2c32a4868e0cf8fb@mail.gmail.com> References: <4774142C.50709@pcbsd.com> <20071228215415.GQ40785@server.vk2pj.dyndns.org> <20071230075437.GA75947@server.vk2pj.dyndns.org> <20080104.082310.71095304.chat95@mac.com> <fb5891a50801112059m788408b3h2c32a4868e0cf8fb@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
I agree completely. OO is one of our most popular pieces of software on PC-BSD, and we can't update it for our users until this problem is fixed. Any ETA on doing so? -- Kris Moore PC-BSD Software http://www.pcbsd.com Jeff Colter wrote: > What do you mean it won't be 'integrated' ? > > OO is unusable in FreeBSD. > > Roughly when can I expect to see a revision that works? > > If not soon, how far back in the revisions do I have to go to get a version > that works? > > Tnx, Jeff > > On Jan 3, 2008 3:23 PM, Maho NAKATA <chat95@mac.com> wrote: > >> From: Peter Jeremy <peterjeremy@optushome.com.au> >> Subject: Re: Problem with openoffice 2.3.1 on freebsd... >> Date: Sun, 30 Dec 2007 18:54:38 +1100 >> >>> On Sat, Dec 29, 2007 at 08:54:15AM +1100, Peter Jeremy wrote: >>>> On Thu, Dec 27, 2007 at 10:08:38AM -0500, Kris Moore wrote: >>>>> I noticed that a patch was made to fix it: >>>>> >>>>> >> http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-openoffice/2007-December/003464.html >>>> I've tried this patch and it had no effect - OOo still reports the same >>>> glib initialisation errors and hangs. >>> I tried to short-cut the OOo build and whilst systemshell.cxx was >>> recompiled and libsysshell.a re-created, it seems that libsfx680fi.so >>> was not (I'd verified the former but not the latter). Apologies for >>> misleading the group. >>> >>> In any case, I created a slightly extended version of the patch (which >>> removes all the offending code), did a full re-compile and it now works. >> Huge thanks for your great small patch. >> However, although this is an issue but IMHO this won't be integrated. >> I'll commit it soon. >> >> All the best, >> -- Nakata Maho (maho@FreeBSD.org) >> >> > > > !DSPAM:1,4788484a588515153232560! >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?478B6E42.3040303>