Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2007 01:33:18 +0900 From: Daichi GOTO <daichi@freebsd.org> To: Ivan Voras <ivoras@freebsd.org> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: The safety expansion for FreeBSD rm(1) Message-ID: <46F9384E.5010409@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <fdb5a8$486$1@sea.gmane.org> References: <46F905FD.9060208@freebsd.org> <fdb5a8$486$1@sea.gmane.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Ivan Voras wrote: > Daichi GOTO wrote: >> Hi Guys again >> >> Today is not unionfs. > > How is the unionfs patch progressing through re ? :) I hope it gets > digested soon :) I have sent a aprove request to re@ and been waiting for replay. I have a hope to get aproval mail too :) I beleive in that recent unionfs patches bunch is well viewed and working very good. >> We have created safety expansion for rm(1). If you have any interests, >> please try follow patch. >> >> http://people.freebsd.org/~daichi/safety-rm/ > > This looks useful, but shouldn't this feature be handled more globally, > with a MAC policy or something like that? Yes, that is not depending to MAC or other comprehensive access framework. At the beginning, what's important is that I have anyone needs that feature or not ;-) If someone needs that feature, I will get the work of more comprehensive mechanism.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?46F9384E.5010409>