Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 16 Feb 2005 11:50:10 +0800
From:      Xin LI <delphij@frontfree.net>
To:        drhodus@machdep.com
Cc:        Scott Long <scottl@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: Journalling FS and Soft Updates comparision
Message-ID:  <1108525810.676.21.camel@spirit>
In-Reply-To: <fe77c96b0502151935306e9aa1@mail.gmail.com>
References:  <20050210030119.GD29396@alzatex.com> <fe77c96b0502151935306e9aa1@mail.gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

[-- Attachment #1 --]
Hi, David,

在 2005-02-15二的 22:35 -0500,David Rhodus写道:
> > Softupdates really aren't a whole lot different from journalling.  Both
> 
> No, journalling and soft updates are orthogonal technologies; they
> do not solve the same problem space, although there is some minor
> overlap.  Soft updates is not able to solve all the problems which
> journaling can.

Would you please give some examples?  I think a file system journalling
is different from what we have seen in applications, e.g. databases,
since the primary goal of having a journal is to make the file system
recoverable to last checkpoint, is that correct, or maybe I have missed
something?

Thanks!

Cheers,
-- 
Xin LI <delphij delphij net>  http://www.delphij.net/

[-- Attachment #2 --]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQBCEsLy/cVsHxFZiIoRAvUjAJ9zSU6zZr7O/Q1D/s2uPsSsAhfKjwCgigcB
UqzWwdE5jUtDSbvCzLh7Nr0=
=jv2Y
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1108525810.676.21.camel>