Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2023 10:14:52 +0700 From: Eugene Grosbein <eugen@grosbein.net> To: Lee MATTHEWS <Lee.MATTHEWS.external@stormshield.eu>, "freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.org" <freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: BINIT and BERR signals in MCA Message-ID: <c6e28ca2-b8aa-2ce3-56f3-97352a71c949@grosbein.net> In-Reply-To: <fed099e1e6c2448e96883ebb6496347d@stormshield.eu> References: <4bd3e1017a104598ab92e658f25b5367@stormshield.eu> <24a51bf0-71de-f596-ef8b-785da4a27fd7@grosbein.net> <fed099e1e6c2448e96883ebb6496347d@stormshield.eu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
11.04.2023 21:28, Lee MATTHEWS wrote: > Thanks for getting back to me Eugene. > > > On the two cores that I've received, they seem to die at the same point : > > > #4 0xffffffff8049a9e3 in panic (fmt=<unavailable>) at ../../../kern/kern_shutdown.c:714 > #5 0xffffffff80780a2b in mca_intr () at ../../../x86/x86/mca.c:1193 > #6 <signal handler called> > #7 smp_rendezvous_action () at ../../../kern/subr_smp.c:417 > #8 0xffffffff804e5f79 in smp_rendezvous_cpus (map=..., > setup_func=0xffffffff804e5e40 <smp_no_rendezvous_barrier>, > action_func=0xffffffff80496730 <rm_cleanIPI>, > teardown_func=0xffffffff804e5e40 <smp_no_rendezvous_barrier>, arg=0xffffffff80cb5048 <g_conf_lock>) > at ../../../kern/subr_smp.c:554 > #9 0xffffffff80496639 in _rm_wlock (rm=0xffffffff80cb5048 <g_conf_lock>) > at ../../../kern/kern_rmlock.c:551 > > Do you think the temperature could still be an issue? If it were temperature related, > could one not expect the MCA interrupt to occur during other function calls? It depends on how much time it spends waiting for events vs. doing other things.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?c6e28ca2-b8aa-2ce3-56f3-97352a71c949>