Date: Sun, 06 Jul 2008 08:56:36 -0500 From: eculp <eculp@encontacto.net> To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Lack of Flash support is no longer acceptable. alternatives? Message-ID: <20080706085636.280786wmdmf7wq3c@intranet.encontacto.net> In-Reply-To: <g4of85$d8v$1@ger.gmane.org> References: <20080619135114.Y1807@kozubik.com> <20080620083906.71332251xw1ckmu8@webmail.leidinger.net> <1213972236.1505.14.camel@scotth.emsphone.com> <20080624083829.T1807@kozubik.com> <20080624121734.171218nrcilz164k@intranet.encontacto.net> <g4of85$d8v$1@ger.gmane.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Quoting Marcin Cieslak <saper@system.pl>: > eculp wrote: >> Quoting John Kozubik <john@kozubik.com>: > >> Thanks, for reminding me but I will put another 100 dollars for the =20 >> same but I need it to work on FreeBSD 7 and 8, amd64 and i386 =20 >> although if justifiable I could get by without amd64 but would =20 >> rather not. (My > > A secret binary under NDA will not make users on all architectures =20 > happy (yes, you can compile once, but maintain the port...?). > > I hope that alternatives (silverlight / moonlight) and gnash will =20 > make matters better. Recent gnash snapshots are getting much more =20 > usable (0.8.2rc played Youtube movies just fine). > > Gnash has also some nice features - whitelist/blacklist and =20 > debugging so that you can see what URL's is your SWF really =20 > accessing. (I have blacklisted some YT statistics immediately). =20 > Another feature I like is that movies do not have to autostart - you =20 > can play them when you click them. This saves a lot of trouble with =20 > hanging/crashing SWF's. Plus, gnash runs as a separate standalone =20 > process, so a crash is not that bad. I assume it doesn't do any flash 8+ sites, does it? Sites are =20 changing to require flash [8,9] daily:( Youtube works fine with the =20 flash7 plugin. Some bounties have been offered, there was one for 200 dls. and I =20 offered to add 100 more. It was focused on the flashplugin but =20 anything that a regular user (read wives) could use without =20 complaining, would be great, EMO. Maybe someone who is a commiter and =20 would take charge of judging and paying the bounty, I feel others =20 would chip in and maybe we could make it worthwhile. Thanks, ed
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20080706085636.280786wmdmf7wq3c>