Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2012 20:35:18 +0000 From: Doug Sampson <dougs@dawnsign.com> To: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Subject: RE: What replaces csup? Message-ID: <E6B2517F8D6DBF4CABB8F38ACA367E780CF84DE8@Draco.dawnsign.com> In-Reply-To: <k3dkd6$45h$1@ger.gmane.org> References: <D97788AE24B7FFB0C79AA6FB@localhost> <k38bct$ang$1@ger.gmane.org> <780066C6E2FAB67A997876B7@Pauls-MacBook-Pro.local> <20567.50041.903201.979498@jerusalem.litteratus.org> <39B0E74E2DF04033DE7D0080@Pauls-MacBook-Pro.local> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1209172115020.26215@wonkity.com> <k3d8td$4mq$1@ger.gmane.org> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1209191610280.7723@wonkity.com> <k3dkd6$45h$1@ger.gmane.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > I also find portsnap slower than either > > csup or svn. > > That surprises me. Once the initial download and extract is done, I find > "portsnap fetch update" to be miles faster than csup. However, each to > his own, I suppose. +1
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?E6B2517F8D6DBF4CABB8F38ACA367E780CF84DE8>