Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2013 10:42:12 +0300 From: "Sergey V. Dyatko" <sergey.dyatko@gmail.com> To: Walter Hurry <walterhurry@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn - but smaller? Message-ID: <20130125104212.6d51687f@laptop> In-Reply-To: <kdtc5u$3dp$1@ger.gmane.org> References: <20130123144050.GG51786@e-Gitt.NET> <20130124093846.5e683474@laptop> <0c1603f1-a6af-4511-b230-8b791df7f9d7@email.android.com> <20130125090958.2700cc5b@laptop> <kdtc5u$3dp$1@ger.gmane.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 25 Jan 2013 07:27:58 +0000 (UTC) Walter Hurry <walterhurry@gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, 25 Jan 2013 09:09:58 +0300, Sergey V. Dyatko wrote: > > > On Thu, 24 Jan 2013 00:06:47 -0800 Derek Kulinski <takeda@takeda.tk> > > wrote: > > > >> "Sergey V. Dyatko" <sergey.dyatko@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > >> >You may: > >> >1/ install subversion on some host/jail 2/ do svn export ( f.e. > >> >svn://svn.freebsd.org/base/releng/9 stable_9) > >> >3/ tar it 4/ on 'client' fetch(1)/scp/rsync tarball > >> > > >> >in that case you don't need svn on 'client', fetch and scp in > >> >base :) > >> > >> If you go through all of that why not just install the damn svn > >> from ports? > > > > I have svn installed on all my boxes (for src and configs) ;-) > > > > > >> I think you don't understand the reason why people are asking for > >> this. I personally experienced the need not long ago. I had > >> stable/9 branch and wanted to downgrade to 9.0. The entire process > >> went well until I rebooted the system, to see tons of errors in > >> pretty much everything that was compiled from ports. Instead > >> recompiling them from scratch I just decided to go ahead and > >> upgrade to 9.1 which was not officially released yet. > >> > > how in this case you would have helped availability lite-svn-client > > on base ? > > > >> And of course I could not perform svn sw because svn was broken > >> too. > > r232944 | lev | 2009-04-29 15:11:17 +0300 ... > > (3) Add STATIC option to build only static binaries [2] > > ... > > > >> And since svn has tons of dependencies it took me nearly an hour to > >> recompile them (portupgrade and Ruby were broken too). > >> > >> > > that's why I don't use portupgrade for a long time;-) > > use portmaster WTF > > Portupgrade works fine for me. What's the problem with it? > 1) "portupgrade and Ruby were broken too" from original email (yep, long time ago I faced with this too) 2) heavy depts(ruby) 3) don't know how it is now, but before it was supported weakly (large thread in ports@ (?) year or two ago, IIRC) -- wbr, tiger
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20130125104212.6d51687f>