Date: Sun, 1 Jun 1997 20:10:27 +0100 From: Bob Bishop <rb@gid.co.uk> To: Richard Wackerbarth <rkw@dataplex.net> Cc: freebsd-current@freefall.FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ctm Message-ID: <l03020900afb779430e33@[194.32.164.2]> In-Reply-To: <l0310280bafb61bd557f9@[208.2.87.4]> References: <l03020902afb5beb3f221@[194.32.164.2]> <199705301253.OAA04727@sliphost37.uni-trier.de> <199705300624.IAA03466@sos.freebsd.dk> <Pine.BSF.3.91.970529234559.364C-100000@Journey2.mat.net> <199705300624.IAA03466@sos.freebsd.dk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
At 19:23 +0100 31/5/97, Richard Wackerbarth wrote: >At 6:49 AM -0500 5/31/97, Bob Bishop wrote: >>>14 amicus-networks.Dallas.mci.net (204.70.147.70) 207 ms * 211 ms >>>15 10.1.1.3 (10.1.1.3) 230 ms 187 ms 187 ms >> >>Eeek! Noone should be advertising a route to 10.x.x.x (see RFC1918). Try >>shouting at mci.net > >Who says that they are advertising a route to 10.x.x.x? >The advertised route is to 208.2.87.x You're right, of course; ISC. However, I share Gary Palmer's misgivings about using private space in this way. -- Bob Bishop (0118) 977 4017 international code +44 118 rb@gid.co.uk fax (0118) 989 4254 between 0800 and 1800 UK
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?l03020900afb779430e33>