Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2004 22:28:44 -0400 From: David Gilbert <dgilbert@dclg.ca> To: "George V. Neville-Neil" <gnn@neville-neil.com> Cc: Mike Tancsa <mike@sentex.net> Subject: Re: IPSec on current. Message-ID: <16768.22876.926445.412412@canoe.dclg.ca> In-Reply-To: <m2fz3ztwct.wl@minion.local.neville-neil.com> References: <16767.52282.937187.190919@canoe.dclg.ca> <6.1.2.0.0.20041027124606.09c40768@64.7.153.2> <16767.53956.366966.737912@canoe.dclg.ca> <6.1.2.0.0.20041027131824.10140c90@64.7.153.2> <m2fz3ztwct.wl@minion.local.neville-neil.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>>>>> "George" == George V Neville-Neil <gnn@neville-neil.com> writes: George> At Wed, 27 Oct 2004 13:19:33 -0400, Mike Tancsa wrote: >> At 12:54 PM 27/10/2004, David Gilbert wrote: >> >> >So ... are you saying that FAST_IPSEC excludes INET6? >> >> As far as I know, yes. It needs to be disabled. In the BUGS section >> of the man page, "There is presently no support for IPv6." >> >> Perhaps sam@freebsd.org can confirm. George> Just for the record, yes, FAST_IPSEC does not support INET6. It's also possible that the division panic and the GPF panic were with and without INET6. I not on the machine at the momment. Not supporting IPv6 is less of a showstopper than not supporting FAST_IPSEC as the later is required (for isntance) BGP. Dave. -- ============================================================================ |David Gilbert, Independent Contractor. | Two things can only be | |Mail: dave@daveg.ca | equal if and only if they | |http://daveg.ca | are precisely opposite. | =========================================================GLO================
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?16768.22876.926445.412412>