Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 01 Oct 1999 15:33:52 -0700
From:      schluntz@timberwolf.workofstone.net
To:        elazich@AlaskaAir.com, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Routing Question. 
Message-ID:  <199910012305.QAA07439@c956029-a.haywd2.sfba.home.com>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Fri, 01 Oct 1999 15:25:05 PDT." <msg1273573.thr-9cd8bb3e.84746b8e@alaskaair.com> 

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

In message <msg1273573.thr-9cd8bb3e.84746b8e@alaskaair.com>, elazich@AlaskaAir.
com writes:
>you should be able to do this by including the interface via which
>traffic will be directed for the internal net.  the rule might look
>like;
>
>ipfw add pass all from 10.0.0.0/8 to any via [interface name]

I thought that, but then where does it get the info for where the gateway for that interface is? My default route points to a third interface (not the private subnet or the NAT outside interface) If it just pushes packets out that interface with no gateway (or the other gateway) attached to them won't they just get lost?


-Sean


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199910012305.QAA07439>