Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2006 11:33:39 -0700 From: "Kevin Oberman" <oberman@es.net> To: "Jeremy Messenger" <mezz7@cox.net> Cc: gnome@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Unable to re-install gnumeric Message-ID: <20061016183339.6F8AF4504D@ptavv.es.net> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Mon, 16 Oct 2006 12:12:09 CDT." <op.thix2jnu9aq2h7@mezz.mezzweb.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--==_Exmh_1161023619_87627P Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline > Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2006 12:12:09 -0500 > From: "Jeremy Messenger" <mezz7@cox.net> > > On Mon, 16 Oct 2006 10:16:16 -0500, Kevin Oberman <oberman@es.net> wrote> : > > >> Date: Sun, 15 Oct 2006 22:36:02 -0500 > >> From: "Jeremy Messenger" <mezz7@cox.net> > >> > >> On Sun, 15 Oct 2006 16:16:48 -0500, Kevin Oberman <oberman@es.net> > >> wrote> : > >> > >> > And this time I'll include the actual error. Sorry! > >> > >> Did you follow the /usr/ports/UPDATING? Can you show the full log of it > >> and also show config.log? It can give the better hints for which stuff > >> that is need to be reinstall. > > > > I did follow /usr/ports/UPDATING using 'pkgdb -Ff' and > > portupgrade. Other than the problem with libtool from the Gnumeric > > install, everything went smoothly. > > > > I will attach the full build log and config.log files. I have taken > > the failed libtool call, extracted all of the referenced libraries, and > > run ldd over all of them. None shows libglade-2.0 in X11R6. > > > > I'm in agreement with Joe that the problem is some stale file, but, if > > it's orphaned in the ports system, I'm unsure how to track it down. > > The logs help, it looks like goffice is the blame at most. Try to > reinstall both devel/goffice and devel/popt. Why devel/popt? Because, it > is still linking on libc.so.6, which your system has libc.so.7. See errors > in your config.log: > > ========================> ===================== > /usr/bin/ld: warning: libgsf-gnome-1.so.113, needed by > /usr/X11R6/lib/libgoffice-1.so, may conflict with libgsf-gnome-1.so.114 > /usr/bin/ld: warning: libgsf-1.so.113, needed by > /usr/X11R6/lib/libgoffice-1.so, may conflict with libgsf-1.so.114 > /usr/bin/ld: warning: libc.so.6, needed by /usr/local/lib/libpopt.so, may > conflict with libc.so.7 > /lib/libc.so.6: warning: WARNING! setkey(3) not present in the system! > /lib/libc.so.6: warning: warning: this program uses gets(), which is > unsafe. > /lib/libc.so.6: warning: warning: mktemp() possibly used unsafely; > consider using mkstemp() > /lib/libc.so.6: warning: WARNING! des_setkey(3) not present in the system! > /lib/libc.so.6: warning: WARNING! encrypt(3) not present in the system! > /lib/libc.so.6: warning: warning: tmpnam() possibly used unsafely; > consider using mkstemp() > /lib/libc.so.6: warning: warning: this program uses f_prealloc(), which is > not recommended. > /lib/libc.so.6: warning: WARNING! des_cipher(3) not present in the system! > /lib/libc.so.6: warning: warning: tempnam() possibly used unsafely; > consider using mkstemp() > ========================> ===================== > > Maybe you might want to run 'make delete-old ; make delete-old-libs' in > /usr/src to clean up your system, but I don't know if libc.so.6 is in the > remove list in -CURRENT yet. Mezz, Thanks! That did the trick. Since I did the portupgrade procedure and I know that goffice was re-built (i happened to be watching as that one went by), I am baffled as to why it linked to the wrong libs, but I suspect it had to do with the upgrade sequence being wrong and it linked to something that had not been re-built for some reason. I was also able to fetch nautilus-open-terminal today, so the update is now complete. -- R. Kevin Oberman, Network Engineer Energy Sciences Network (ESnet) Ernest O. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (Berkeley Lab) E-mail: oberman@es.net Phone: +1 510 486-8634 Key fingerprint:059B 2DDF 031C 9BA3 14A4 EADA 927D EBB3 987B 3751 --==_Exmh_1161023619_87627P Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (FreeBSD) Comment: Exmh version 2.5 06/03/2002 iD8DBQFFM9CDkn3rs5h7N1ERAiqqAJ9ypj0vG5NXf0eAYX3sO2jQoqDeOwCgq1hc w55IbIt8I1Vna2yVnA2JvL4= =VcC5 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --==_Exmh_1161023619_87627P--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20061016183339.6F8AF4504D>