Date: Mon, 05 Jan 2004 22:06:23 -0500 From: Joe Marcus Clarke <marcus@FreeBSD.org> To: Jeremy Messenger <mezz7@cox.net> Cc: Adam Weinberger <adamw@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: RFC: Restructuring GNOME meta-ports Message-ID: <1073358382.43391.20.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com> In-Reply-To: <opr1b0l1f28ckrg5@smtp.central.cox.net> References: <1073346203.765.210.camel@gyros> <20040106015049.GM27144@toxic.magnesium.net> <opr1b0l1f28ckrg5@smtp.central.cox.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--=-WXD2jMvETdqxlCljrik5 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, 2004-01-05 at 21:16, Jeremy Messenger wrote: > On Mon, 5 Jan 2004 20:50:49 -0500, Adam Weinberger <adamw@FreeBSD.org>=20 > wrote: >=20 > >>> (01.05.2004 @ 1843 PST): Joe Marcus Clarke said, in 1.9K: << > >> I was thinking maybe we should borrow something from garnome seeing as > >> since they've borrowed practically everything from us already ;-) (the > >> ports system, that is). What if we restructured the GNOME meta-ports = to > >> look something like this: > >> > >> x11/gnome2 (leave it the way it is) > >> x11/gnome2-lite (leave it the way it is) > > > > I would rather see an x11/gnome2-desktop port, and have x11/gnome2 be a > > metaport for the Whole Damn Thing. Or, well... I think there should be = a > > meta meta port. >=20 > Or, opposite? x11/gnome2-desktop have the Whole Damn Thing. I think,=20 > x11/gnome2 should be stick to what www.gnome.org has. >=20 > > Also, I think that gnome2-lite could also perhaps be made to be a meta > > meta port. > > > >> x11/gnome2-fifth-toe (Will consist of the following): > >> graphics/gthumb2 news/pan2 net/gnomeicu2 > >> x11-toolkits/gnome-themes-extras sysutils/gkrellm > >> graphics/gimp-devel www/bluefish-devel > >> net/tsclient graphics/sodipodi >=20 > graphics/inkscape is doing a lot better than graphics/sodipodi now, so=20 > should be either add or replace imo. Yes, of course. I forgot we had a port of inkscape. That could also go into the Fifth Toe. >=20 > > I'd like to see maybe an entertainment category. Totem, rhythmbox, > > xchat2, gossip, gnomeicu2, etc. Maybe a systemtools category that > > contains gftp, gnomenetwork, etc. Dunno where all of this leaves gkrell= m > > and gdesklets, but I think that they should be in the same category. > > Besides, gdesklets seems to be becoming more popular than gkrellm2, > > development of which seems to have slowed to a halt. >=20 > I couldn't see how gkrellm can be part of Gnome, so I am disagree for=20 > gkrellm to be part of Gnome's meta port. It was part of the garnome package. If we don't like, we can axe it. Joe >=20 > Anyway, it won't be easy to make that kind of decision...too many apps..=20 > :-) >=20 > Cheers, > Mezz >=20 > > # Adam > > > > > > -- > > Adam Weinberger > > vectors.cx >> adam@vectors.cx >> http://www.vectors.cx > > magnesium.net << adamw@magnesium.net << http://www.magnesium.net/~ada= mw > > FreeBSD >> adamw@FreeBSD.org >> http://people.freebsd.org/~adamw > > #vim:set ts=3D8: 8-char tabs prevent tooth decay. --=20 Joe Marcus Clarke FreeBSD GNOME Team :: gnome@FreeBSD.org FreeNode / #freebsd-gnome http://www.FreeBSD.org/gnome --=-WXD2jMvETdqxlCljrik5 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQA/+iYub2iPiv4Uz4cRAgT0AJ0U6jVnBmJO3IQjFwOsZew5Gp5tYACgj/jv QZFGNmr5jxTBg4V4Bcti+lM= =p2d2 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-WXD2jMvETdqxlCljrik5--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1073358382.43391.20.camel>