Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2005 14:05:12 -0800 From: "Michael C. Shultz" <reso3w83@verizon.net> To: "Jeremy Messenger" <mezz7@cox.net> Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Unmaintained ports [was: Re: Unmaintained ports with fetch errors] Message-ID: <200502141405.13199.reso3w83@verizon.net> In-Reply-To: <opsl7jf9dp9aq2h7@mezz.mezzweb.com> References: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0502141418580.24248-100000@pancho> <1108417167.36205.2.camel@hood.oook.cz> <opsl7jf9dp9aq2h7@mezz.mezzweb.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Monday 14 February 2005 02:01 pm, you wrote: > On Mon, 14 Feb 2005 22:39:27 +0100, Pav Lucistnik <pav@FreeBSD.org>=20 wrote: > > Michael C. Shultz p=C3=AD=C5=A1e v po 14. 02. 2005 v 13:24 -0800: > >> Mark, I'd love to take over gettext. The way that one is packaged > >> has annoyed me for ages. Do I just submit a PR taking over > >> maintainership or do I wait until someone gives the ok? > > > > Uhh, how exactly you want to change gettext port? I intend to eliminate it running configure in all the subdirectories. > > > > It's one of the core ports, ports such important even no brave > > knight of the round table ever dare to claim maintainership on it Chickens ;) > > ... > > I agree. > > Cheers, > Mezz Well I think I can handle it and I will happily submit changes to anyone who wants to see them for themselves before hand. =2DMike
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200502141405.13199.reso3w83>