Date: Thu, 6 Jun 2002 10:16:27 -0700 From: "David O'Brien" <dev-null@NUXI.com> To: Garance A Drosihn <drosih@rpi.edu> Cc: Brian Somers <brian@Awfulhak.org>, arch@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Avoiding unnecessary breakage (was Re: Removing wait union) Message-ID: <20020606101627.G59829@dragon.nuxi.com> In-Reply-To: <p0511172cb92425b8c91d@[128.113.24.47]>; from drosih@rpi.edu on Wed, Jun 05, 2002 at 05:37:23PM -0400 References: <200206050051.UAA07971@renown.cnchost.com> <p05111729b92324e697ef@[128.113.24.47]> <20020605192430.1f29c8d2.brian@Awfulhak.org> <p0511172cb92425b8c91d@[128.113.24.47]>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Jun 05, 2002 at 05:37:23PM -0400, Garance A Drosihn wrote: > I agree that we could do a better job of smoothing in the > transition of some incompatible changes. But it is my feeling > that "major releases" are probably not the best way to set the > timescale for those transitions. 2.0 -> 3.0 took four years, "major releases" in the version 2 days were X.Y. Thus you need to compaire 2.0[.0]->2.1.0->2.2.0->3.0. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020606101627.G59829>