Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2002 14:02:11 -0400 From: Garance A Drosihn <drosih@rpi.edu> To: Robert Drehmel <robert@zoot.drehmel.com>, current@FreeBSD.ORG Cc: robert@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: changing 'struct utmp' Message-ID: <p051117b2b9425468b63e@[128.113.24.47]> In-Reply-To: <p051117b1b94238eb44fc@[128.113.24.47]> References: <20020628110244.A34627@bsd.develop.ferrari.local> <p051117b1b94238eb44fc@[128.113.24.47]>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
At 12:21 PM -0400 6/28/02, Garance A Drosihn wrote: >I think it's better to leave utmp as it is, and start work on a >utmpx definition which is more standardized. Access to this >new improved database should be through the endutxent, getutxent, >getutxid, getutxline, pututxline, and setutxent routines. See http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/007904975/functions/getutxent.html >See also the standardized definition of utmpx.h. http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/007904975/basedefs/utmpx.h.html -- Garance Alistair Drosehn = gad@gilead.netel.rpi.edu Senior Systems Programmer or gad@freebsd.org Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute or drosih@rpi.edu To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?p051117b2b9425468b63e>