Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2004 07:12:52 +0100 From: des@des.no (Dag-Erling =?iso-8859-1?q?Sm=F8rgrav?=) To: Garance A Drosihn <drosih@rpi.edu> Cc: sparc64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Problem with DHCLIENT vs 64-bit time_t Message-ID: <xzpy8qucoij.fsf@dwp.des.no> In-Reply-To: <p06020476bc5f2b073f02@[128.113.24.47]> (Garance A. Drosihn's message of "Sun, 22 Feb 2004 23:16:58 -0500") References: <p06020407bc533f0ae9d2@[128.113.24.47]> <20040215060047.GA62840@dhcp01.pn.xcllnt.net> <p0602040ebc54c885236b@[128.113.24.47]> <20040215165913.M30161@grogged.dyndns.org> <p06020425bc571c20bcde@[128.113.24.47]> <p06020466bc5e09bf7182@[128.113.24.47]> <xzpznbbwfxb.fsf@dwp.des.no> <p06020476bc5f2b073f02@[128.113.24.47]>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Garance A Drosihn <drosih@rpi.edu> writes: > When comparing the warnings from i386 to those from sparc64, > sparc64 sees about 50 extra warnings about: > warning: cast increases required alignment of target type > > Would this be a possible cause of inconsistent (and usually broken) > behavior in a program? Do we need to try to fix all of those? Probably. I'm not sure it's worth it. The code looks like whoever wrote it knew zip about C. You should try to get a newer version imported and hope the ISC fixed it themselves. DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav - des@des.no
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?xzpy8qucoij.fsf>