Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2001 15:36:13 +0900 From: Shoichi Sakane <sakane@kame.net> To: freebsd-security-local@insignia.com Cc: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Subject: Re: KAME IPSec <->Redcreek Message-ID: <20011122153613U.sakane@kame.net> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 21 Nov 2001 10:21:04 %2B0000" <qqvmvtckukhor2be608nt0isnqamfce75k@4ax.com> References: <qqvmvtckukhor2be608nt0isnqamfce75k@4ax.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> I wonder anyone has had success talking to a RedCreek Ravlin > VPN gateway. I have some colleagues who are successfully using > freeswan, but I'm having none at all with racoon. > > A packet trace shows the initial packet going to port 500 of > the Ravlin, but no response. Unfortunately the Ravlin doesn't > syslog anything at all in this situation, so it's kind of > hard to debug! did you compare between the ravlin's configuration and racoon's one ? if there was a mismatch, the negotiation would fail. during the phase1 negotiation, sometime the node would discard siliently. there is a possibility that the ravlin requires the main mode of IKE. but according to your explanation, the packet might not reach the port 500 of the ravlin because there might be a packet filtering. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20011122153613U.sakane>