Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 9 Mar 2005 12:07:57 -0600
From:      Noel Jones <noeldude@gmail.com>
To:        freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: postfix on FreeBSD
Message-ID:  <cce506b050309100752b6f700@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <slrnd2udif.5so.apeiron%2Busenet@prophecy.dyndns.org>
References:  <a3a41bf2be38045b61441aaed6309228@chrononomicon.com> <EB44D0E01F096C02B696376F@utd49554.utdallas.edu> <slrnd2udif.5so.apeiron%2Busenet@prophecy.dyndns.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 9 Mar 2005 17:45:34 +0000 (UTC), Christopher Nehren
<apeiron+usenet@coitusmentis.info> wrote:
> On 2005-03-09, Paul Schmehl scribbled these
> curious markings:
> > Should be:
> > postmap hash:/usr/local/etc/postfix/access
> 
> Really? I've updated hash files (not access, but canonical and
> transport) without the hash: prefix and they've worked fine. Taking a
> look at the top of those files even shows the usage without the hash:
> prefix (access included).
> 
> Best Regards,
> Christopher Nehren

If you don't specify the database type, postfix will use the defined
default_database_type
Unless you are using multiple database types, you don't need to specify this.

-- 
Noel Jones



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?cce506b050309100752b6f700>