Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 16 Aug 2013 16:08:27 +0200
From:      Harald Schmalzbauer <h.schmalzbauer@omnilan.de>
To:        freebsd-stable <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: status of autotuning freebsd for 9.2
Message-ID:  <520E325B.2090804@omnilan.de>
In-Reply-To: <trinity-0aface3a-147f-4fc1-ab62-a2c25cedce96-1374003773426@3capp-gmx-bs30>
References:  <51D90B9B.9080209@ixsystems.com> <51D92826.1070707@freebsd.org> <51E1061F.3050804@ixsystems.com> <51E398F3.40008@freebsd.org> <51E3EEAA.3040106@freebsd.org> <51E3EFA8.1050606@ixsystems.com> <20130715141300.GA1986@glenbarber.us> <51E41419.3040503@ixsystems.com>, <CAOaKuAVxApLLntQ0dqtGWGveveFXyHd6D_%2BVtG%2BfctszKnwF4Q@mail.gmail.com> <trinity-0aface3a-147f-4fc1-ab62-a2c25cedce96-1374003773426@3capp-gmx-bs30>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156)
--------------enig52CF128A10F52682DEFC6708
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

 Bez=C3=BCglich Pascal Drecker's Nachricht vom 16.07.2013 21:42 (localtim=
e):
> ...
>    >>>> IMHO, this is considered a new feature, and not a critical bug
>    fix. re@
>    >>> asked from the start of the code slush to avoid new features, an=
d
>    at
>    >>> this point, it is too late. It is not worth introducing possible=

>    >>> regressions, which will only delay the 9.2-RELEASE.
>    >>>
>    >>> Glen
>    >>>
>    >>> OK, then we need a release notes telling people a sane value for=

>    >> nmbclusters and friends so that they know how to make 10gigE work=
=2E
>    >>
>    >> I'll poll my team for a value if someone else has one, that would=
 be
>    even
>    >> better.
>    >>
>    >> --
>    >> Alfred Perlstein
>    >> VP Software Engineering, iXsystems
>    >
>    >
>    >Is there a possibility that a separate unofficial patch set could b=
e
>    >released for people who want the autotuning but do not want to run =
9
>    >stable after 9.2 is released.
>    >I would like the autotuning, but i am a little reluctent to use oth=
er
>    >stable stuff i will get when tracking stable.
>    >
>    >Regards
>    >Johan
>
>    Hi,
>
>    I think that's a good point.
>
>    In our company, it=EF=BF=BDs not allowed to use the stable tree for =
any
>    production system. Little and useful patches are still allowed.
>
>    Having a central point with a description of each patch it would be
>    much easier to update the release version with the needed patches.

You're welcome using my "deploy-tools" patchsets.
I'm deploying RELENG only, but with local patchset-policy. Originally,
these are automtically handled during build-process with deploy-tools,
but of course you can selective/manually apply the desired patches from
the "local-patches" directory:

ftp://ftp.omnilan.de/pub/FreeBSD/OmniLAN/deploy-tools/

Best regards,

-Harry


--------------enig52CF128A10F52682DEFC6708
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.18 (FreeBSD)

iEYEARECAAYFAlIOMmkACgkQLDqVQ9VXb8iJDgCfa/vzlPEUC/KjMAMV6S5h2cx1
urYAoIf9gp7i7Gzy9i+Sn0uZPKKaRcjG
=8Gcl
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--------------enig52CF128A10F52682DEFC6708--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?520E325B.2090804>