Date: Mon, 27 Mar 2000 13:32:14 -0800 From: David Holloway <davidhol@windriver.com> To: Brad Knowles <blk@skynet.be> Cc: Daniel Eischen <eischen@vigrid.com>, nms@otdel-1.org, freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Is there spinlocks/semaphores available for drivers? Message-ID: <200003272132.NAA09524@papermill.wrs.com> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Mon, 27 Mar 2000 20:24:20 %2B0200." <v04220817b50557761ed5@[195.238.1.121]>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
The 3940U2W has two pci devices. One for each scsi interface. Each interface uses a separate pci interrupt. One uses INTA the other probably uses INTB and which irq they uses depends on your motherboard. In message <v04220817b50557761ed5@[195.238.1.121]>, Brad Knowles writes: >At 9:53 AM -0800 2000/3/27, Matthew Dillon wrote: > >> So, frankly, it is perfectly acceptable. I can't think of a single >> real-life setup that would sufffer. > > What about things like Adaptec 3940U2W controllers that have two >SCSI interfaces, and by default I believe will want shared >interrupts? Or controllers that have more then two interfaces? > > Or have I missed something fundamental here and this is not what >you're talking about? > >-- > These are my opinions -- not to be taken as official Skynet policy >====================================================================== >Brad Knowles, <blk@skynet.be> || Belgacom Skynet SA/NV >Systems Architect, Mail/News/FTP/Proxy Admin || Rue Colonel Bourg, 124 >Phone/Fax: +32-2-706.13.11/12.49 || B-1140 Brussels >http://www.skynet.be || Belgium > > >To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org >with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200003272132.NAA09524>