Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 22 Feb 2000 12:47:27 +0200
From:      Mark Murray <mark@grondar.za>
To:        Kai.Grossjohann@CS.Uni-Dortmund.DE (Kai=?iso-8859-1?q?_Gro=DFjohann?=)
Cc:        current@FreeBSD.org, committers@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: Crypto progress! (And a Biiiig TODO list) 
Message-ID:  <200002221047.MAA89379@grimreaper.grondar.za>
In-Reply-To: <vafya8eoifv.fsf@lucy.cs.uni-dortmund.de> ; from Kai.Grossjohann@CS.Uni-Dortmund.DE (Kai=?iso-8859-1?q?_Gro=DFjohann?=)  "21 Feb 2000 13:20:52 %2B0100."
References:  <vafya8eoifv.fsf@lucy.cs.uni-dortmund.de> 

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> Paul Richards <paul@originative.co.uk> writes:
> 
> > The daemon approach actually has benfits that I'm keen on that aren't
> > related to security. A single point of access to the data means that the
> > backend can be changed so that passwords can be in a different file or a
> > database, without having to worry about rebuilding all the binaries. You
> > could even split users across different back end systems.
> 
> This sounds like PAM, doesn't it?

One of the prime uses for the tool will be PAM.

M
--
Mark Murray
Join the anti-SPAM movement: http://www.cauce.org


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200002221047.MAA89379>