Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2011 08:26:11 -0700 (MST) From: Warren Block <wblock@wonkity.com> To: Helmut Schneider <jumper99@gmx.de> Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Update of ImageMagick to 6.6.7.10, dependencies Message-ID: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1103110816200.55175@wonkity.com> In-Reply-To: <xn0hbhn2q1gkx4000@news.gmane.org> References: <xn0hbfq6stdcre003@news.gmane.org> <AANLkTikr36mcYCpx0u9RDYRaVzZ9_j_ahn=ru3M3sxdV@mail.gmail.com> <xn0hbfqq4u5a74004@news.gmane.org> <20110310092002.GC99577@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> <xn0hbg8au1cmys000@news.gmane.org> <4D7921A4.1090001@FreeBSD.org> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1103101423150.51779@wonkity.com> <4D794933.6040107@FreeBSD.org> <xn0hbhn2q1gkx4000@news.gmane.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 11 Mar 2011, Helmut Schneider wrote:
> Doug Barton wrote:
>
>> On 03/10/2011 13:29, Warren Block wrote:
>>> On Thu, 10 Mar 2011, Doug Barton wrote:
>>>> On 03/10/2011 02:40, Helmut Schneider wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> ...most of "my" users won't run Typo3 and X on the same
>>>>> machine. :)
>>>>
>>>> Sounds like it's time for imagemagick-nox11 slave port.
>>>
>>> Would that be different from turning off the X11 config option of
>>> the ImageMagick port?
>>
>> The idea of having a slave port would be to allow ports like typo3 to
>> depend on it directly, and reduce the chances of user confusion.
>
> Where should I request/ask for a nox11 port? (And no, ImageMagick, even
> a "simple" subport, is nothing I can maintain)
It should just be a little Makefile. Copying from the ghostscript-nox11
port:
WITHOUT_X11= yes
MASTERDIR= ${.CURDIR}/../ImageMagick
.include "${MASTERDIR}/Makefile"
Untested.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?alpine.BSF.2.00.1103110816200.55175>