Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2011 13:55:55 -0700 From: Chip Camden <sterling@camdensoftware.com> To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Print +REQUIRED_BY as tree? Message-ID: <20110912205555.GC51718@libertas.local.camdensoftware.com> In-Reply-To: <xn0hj17h1a2f4xu001@news.gmane.org> References: <503309410.20110912205856@serebryakov.spb.ru> <xn0hj17h1a2f4xu001@news.gmane.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--YD3LsXFS42OYHhNZ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Quoth Helmut Schneider on Monday, 12 September 2011: > Lev Serebryakov wrote: >=20 > > Is here console tool, which shows dependency tree of installed ports > > from "required" port to "users"? pkg_tree performs opposite task. > >=20 > > +REQUIRED_BY is flat list, unfortunately. > >=20 > > I need to investigate exact path why this port is installed on my > > system :) >=20 > Neither I'm a perl expert nor it is final but hth anyway. >=20 > http://www.charlieroot.de/bsd/pkg_depends.pl >=20 Thanks for that, Helmut! --=20 =2EO. | Sterling (Chip) Camden | http://camdensoftware.com =2E.O | sterling@camdensoftware.com | http://chipsquips.com OOO | 2048R/D6DBAF91 | http://chipstips.com --YD3LsXFS42OYHhNZ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (FreeBSD) iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJObnHbAAoJEIpckszW26+RHtgIAL1MGddLu+YXB7imzL5fB/WW yFy+TX3KHX0QOyahQHJWG6kRRRZDpLwj5nJpRFG8pmwiEmYqTfUvqYF8zKHyRlAg IVocUZYIjziFEXQun2gwpcjp+oRMk84yt4Sa5hg/h/YI59kZZCT6ZtPIP+yylvAC qTPKPFVsxvs1Ia0ypy16mJiRX4MncPvOcJjc/6NqIx/l9pbwKHfT5HWFPulZTXzH O1BRgI8Mj7vUve/Rfgx/5PFoDyZo3XA8mtsFiCVQ1hFg2CMIFNxHwx24Dzan4dm8 A3uqMpfpTk49z64OPx6Wk3UX8igs/x57Ygr3yRzMq090B58MUa9chGTolLrtyKs= =SjQl -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --YD3LsXFS42OYHhNZ--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20110912205555.GC51718>