Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 28 Jan 2001 00:25:25 GMT
From:      Salvo Bartolotta <bartequi@inwind.it>
To:        Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@ofug.org>
Cc:        Mike Meyer <mwm@mired.org>, freebsd-chat@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: OT again: Re: hexidecimal literacy
Message-ID:  <20010128.252500@bartequi.ottodomain.org>
In-Reply-To: <xzpbssspmes.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no>
References:  <14963.8033.752142.149320@guru.mired.org> <20010127.20140200@bartequi.ottodomain.org> <14963.13797.116165.382738@guru.mired.org> <20010127.22394200@bartequi.ottodomain.org> <14963.21950.110019.468965@guru.mired.org> <20010127.23473800@bartequi.ottodomain.org> <xzpbssspmes.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Original Message <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<

On 1/28/01, 1:09:47 AM, Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@ofug.org> wrote=20
regarding Re: OT again: Re: hexidecimal literacy:


> Salvo Bartolotta <bartequi@inwind.it> writes:
> > I was thinking of a *positional* system of the kind a*(base raised t=
o
> > 0) + b * (base raised to 1) + ...

> Yes.

> 11111 in unary is 1*(1^0) + 1*(1^1) + 1*(1^2) + 1*(1^3) + 1*(1^4).


This ahem "system" is a little curious: eg how do you represent, erm,=20
0 ? With bells (and whistles) ? :-)

With just one symbol, you are somewhat limited, aren't you ? OTOH, 0=20
is (maybe) the most important number in the history of maths... Ok,ok,=20
I have too much Algebra and Analysis in mind. :-)=20







To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010128.252500>