Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2000 09:15:09 -0700 From: Alfred Perlstein <bright@wintelcom.net> To: Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@flood.ping.uio.no> Cc: Jesper Skriver <jesper@skriver.dk>, Cy Schubert - ITSD Open Systems Group <Cy.Schubert@uumail.gov.bc.ca>, freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Soft updates mount change (17 Jun) Message-ID: <20000628091509.V275@fw.wintelcom.net> In-Reply-To: <xzphfadyh9o.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no>; from des@flood.ping.uio.no on Wed, Jun 28, 2000 at 05:09:07PM %2B0200 References: <200006272212.PAA36120@passer.osg.gov.bc.ca> <20000628094841.D77839@skriver.dk> <xzphfadyh9o.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
* Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@flood.ping.uio.no> [000628 08:11] wrote: > Jesper Skriver <jesper@skriver.dk> writes: > > On Tue, Jun 27, 2000 at 03:12:07PM -0700, Cy Schubert - ITSD Open Systems Group wrote: > > > Would we be interested in doing this? > > It has been discussed several times over the last week or so, and Kirk > > had good arguments for not doing it - the mail archive is your friend. > > s/week/year/. This has been discussed many times, and while the > current solution (fs flag) is not particularly elegant, it is the > lesser evil. IMO there's nothing wrong with mount doing what tunefs does, setting the softdep bit before actually mounting it, changing it while mounted would not be supported. -Alfred To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20000628091509.V275>