Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2003 10:39:45 +0200 From: Stefan Farfeleder <stefan@fafoe.narf.at> To: Dag-Erling =?iso-8859-1?Q?Sm=F8rgrav?= <des@des.no> Cc: ppc@freebsd.org Subject: Re: does powerpc build? Message-ID: <20030731083945.GO563@wombat.fafoe.narf.at> In-Reply-To: <xzpptjr6qy3.fsf@dwp.des.no> References: <xzp3cgn86hi.fsf@dwp.des.no> <20030731082631.GN563@wombat.fafoe.narf.at> <xzpptjr6qy3.fsf@dwp.des.no>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Jul 31, 2003 at 10:28:04AM +0200, Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote: > Stefan Farfeleder <stefan@fafoe.narf.at> writes: > > You have to use something like the attached patch. > > I was told there was no longer any need for patches... > > Why haven't they been committed? I have no idea. The failure you see in the tinderbox is that the file rs6000-c.c which didn't exist before 3.3.1 is not included in our Makefile (I informed kan@ about that some time ago). The other issue is the double definition of _BIG_ENDIAN. I fear this part of the changes from http://people.freebsd.org/~grehan/gcc_freebsd_benno.diff somehow got lost because the macros CPP_ENDIAN_BIG_SPEC and CPP_ENDIAN_LITTLE_SPEC were folded into the new macro RS6000_CPU_CPP_ENDIAN_BUILTINS. Regards, Stefan Farfeleder
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030731083945.GO563>