Date: Wed, 21 May 2003 00:44:58 +0700 From: Max Khon <fjoe@iclub.nsu.ru> To: Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@ofug.org> Cc: Frank Bonnet <bonnetf@bart.esiee.fr> Subject: Re: "su" bug ( diff of pam.d ) Message-ID: <20030520174458.GA67463@iclub.nsu.ru> In-Reply-To: <xzpsmr93mms.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> References: <20030519110242.A21561@bart.esiee.fr> <Pine.NEB.3.96L.1030519144004.59393I-100000@fledge.watson.org> <20030520104417.A4110@bart.esiee.fr> <xzpsmr93mms.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
hi, there! On Tue, May 20, 2003 at 01:04:11PM +0200, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: > > 11c11 > > < auth required pam_unix.so no_warn try_first_pass > > --- > >> auth sufficient /usr/local/lib/pam_ldap.so > > If you're using nss_ldap, you can safely use pam_unix instead of pam_ldap. pam_ldap is still needed in full-featured PAM+NSS environment (pam_ldap is used for changing passwords). Our PAM modules and passwd utility do not support password management. /fjoe
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030520174458.GA67463>