Date: Tue, 2 Sep 2003 21:33:11 +0200 From: Brad Knowles <brad.knowles@skynet.be> To: des@des.no (Dag-Erling =?iso-8859-1?Q?Sm=F8rgrav?= ) Cc: FreeBSD Chat Mailing List <freebsd-chat@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: FreeBSD icons & graphics... Message-ID: <a06001a9dbb7aa039deaa@[10.0.1.2]> In-Reply-To: <xzpvfsb7aji.fsf@dwp.des.no> References: <20030901210523.GA1165@online.fr> <a06001a9abb799be1d9a8@[10.0.1.2]> <xzpvfsb7aji.fsf@dwp.des.no>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
At 12:24 PM +0200 2003/09/02, Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote: > Brad Knowles <brad.knowles@skynet.be> writes: >> At 5:05 PM -0400 2003/09/01, Rahul Siddharthan wrote: >> > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=docs/38556 >> > A scalable EPS file, done using sketch (http://sketch.sf.net) >> This is indeed better than the image in /usr/share/examples/BSD_daemon/. > > It is? it looks like crap on my system (see the attached images). Is > there something wrong with my setup? You attached PNG (Portable Network Graphic) images. The original images are both EPS (Encapsulated PostScript) files. EPS files are inherently scale-free, because they are vector-based. PNGs are bit-mapped. You must have some program you use to turn vector-based images into bit-mapped ones. Whatever that program is, it apparently rendered one file worse than the other. Perhaps you can use a different program that will let you look at the original EPS files in their native vector-based formats. -- Brad Knowles, <brad.knowles@skynet.be> "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." -Benjamin Franklin, Historical Review of Pennsylvania. GCS/IT d+(-) s:+(++)>: a C++(+++)$ UMBSHI++++$ P+>++ L+ !E-(---) W+++(--) N+ !w--- O- M++ V PS++(+++) PE- Y+(++) PGP>+++ t+(+++) 5++(+++) X++(+++) R+(+++) tv+(+++) b+(++++) DI+(++++) D+(++) G+(++++) e++>++++ h--- r---(+++)* z(+++)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?a06001a9dbb7aa039deaa>