Date: Thu, 09 Dec 2004 09:19:58 -0800 From: gnn@FreeBSD.org To: JINMEI Tatuya / =?ISO-2022-JP?B?GyRCP0BMQEMjOkgbKEI=?= <jinmei@isl.rdc.toshiba.co.jp> Cc: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Initial review request for IPv6 Fast Forwarding and IP6STEALTH Message-ID: <m2vfbbtmm9.wl@minion.local.neville-neil.com> In-Reply-To: <y7vllc7hn0g.wl@ocean.jinmei.org> References: <20041115222310.GA93130@scylla.towardex.com> <41B1EB4E.78490459@freebsd.org> <20041206114646.GD999@squash.dsto.defence.gov.au> <y7vllc7hn0g.wl@ocean.jinmei.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
At Thu, 09 Dec 2004 17:52:15 +0900, jinmei wrote: > (Perhaps this is slightly an off-topic for this list, but) I'm also > interested in the reason, but it's not surprising that someone in the > world has a negative impression on a big feature like IPv6 or IPsec, > since such a thing has typically both pros and cons. I'd really hope that this thread does not "devolve" around this issue, and perhaps Andre could answer this privately, as it really is off topic. > So, I hope core FreeBSD developers to care about the quality of IPv6 > implementation as seriously as that of IPv4 implementation, regardless > of their own position on IPv6 itself. As an IPv6-related person, I'm > willing to help that process if I can do something in that area. And as a new committer who's mostly working on IPv6 I can tell you that there are those of us who are working to make sure that the IPv6 in FreeBSD remains top notch. Later, George
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?m2vfbbtmm9.wl>