Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2003 20:39:49 +0300 From: "toxa" <postfix@sendmail.ru> To: "Norikatsu Shigemura" <nork@ninth-nine.com> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: CURRENT state of modules Message-ID: <000f01c3c1a0$1c0b3310$0202a8c0@karputer> References: <200312121910.14245.postfix@sendmail.ru><20031212.124333.73362266.imp@bsdimp.com><20031214011007.3400fe79.nork@ninth-nine.com><001e01c3c19a$ac1b9900$0202a8c0@karputer> <20031214022203.2cb9a232.nork@ninth-nine.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
----- Original Message ----- From: "Norikatsu Shigemura" <nork@ninth-nine.com> To: "toxa" <postfix@sendmail.ru> Cc: <freebsd-current@freebsd.org> Sent: Saturday, December 13, 2003 8:22 PM Subject: Re: CURRENT state of modules > > This is a good question. > > 1. usb module has uhci and ochi drivers (and usb bus driver). > You cannot use *only* uhci or ochi with usb module. So > uhci_load="YES" or ohci_load="YES" is not available. > > 2. device usb is USB Bus driver. device uhci and ochi is > required device usb (USB Bus driver). > > ugen -+ +- uhci (Universal Host Controller Interface) > | | > +--- usb ---+ > | | > umas -+ +- ohci (Open Host Controller Intereface) > So if I understand you properly, I can load usb as module without having device uhci or device ohci in kernel at all, and 'device ohci/uhci', when included in the kernel, require 'device usb' in the kernel too because of required usb bus which is in 'device usb'? Am I right? Thank you.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?000f01c3c1a0$1c0b3310$0202a8c0>