Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2004 04:14:16 +0200 From: "Chris Knipe" <savage@savage.za.org> To: "Gleb Smirnoff" <glebius@freebsd.org> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: PPPoE misbehaving? Message-ID: <001501c46d36$19078000$14e2fea9@savage.za.org> References: <000b01c46b21$ed378cb0$14e2fea9@savage.za.org> <1090000401.1765.14.camel@klotz.local> <20040716193544.GB30194@cell.sick.ru> <004101c46d25$b988bbe0$14e2fea9@savage.za.org> <20040719002252.GB43924@cell.sick.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi Gleb,
I'm afraid to say it still does exactly the same... No change what so
ever...
pppoed:
su-2.05b# /usr/libexec/pppoed -Fd -P /var/run/pppoed.pid -a pppoe -p * -l
pppoe ath0
Sending NGM_LISTHOOKS to ath0:
Got reply from id [1]: Type ether with 1 hooks
Got [1]:orphans -> [4]:ethernet
Sending PPPOE_LISTEN to .:pppoe-601, provider *
pppoed[601]: Listening as provider *
tcpdump:
04:11:47.145798 PPPoE PADI [Service-Name] [Host-Uniq UTF8]
04:11:48.195504 PPPoE PADI [Service-Name] [Host-Uniq UTF8]
HOWEVER!
When I start PPPOE on ath0 (Wireless), and rl0 (cabled), there is definate
differences....
ath0:
su-2.05b# /usr/libexec/pppoed -Fd -P /var/run/pppoed.pid -a pppoe -p * -l
pppoe ath0
Sending NGM_LISTHOOKS to ath0:
Got reply from id [1]: Type ether with 1 hooks
Got [1]:orphans -> [4]:ethernet
Sending PPPOE_LISTEN to .:pppoe-601, provider *
pppoed[601]: Listening as provider *
rl0:
Sending NGM_LISTHOOKS to rl0:
Got reply from id [2]: Type ether with 0 hooks
Send MKPEER: rl0:orphans -> [type pppoe]:ethernet
Sending PPPOE_LISTEN to .:pppoe-602, provider *
pppoed[602]: Listening as provider *
pppoed[602]: Got 60 bytes of data:
ffffffffffff000c766aa50b886311090000001001010000010300080a0000000d0000000000
00000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
pppoed[604]: Creating a new socket node
pppoed[602]: Listening as provider *
pppoed[604]: Sending CONNECT from .:exec-604 -> rl0:orphans.exec-604
pppoed[604]: Sending NGM_SOCK_CMD_NOLINGER to socket
pppoed[604]: Offering to .:exec-604 as access concentrator pppoe
pppoed[604]: adding to .:exec-604 as offered service pppoe
pppoed[604]: Sending original request to .:exec-604 (60 bytes)
pppoed[604]: Waiting for a SUCCESS reply .:exec-604
pppoed[604]: Received NGM_PPPOE_SESSIONID (hook "")
pppoed[604]: Received NGM_PPPOE_SUCCESS (hook "exec-604")
pppoed[604]: Executing: exec /usr/sbin/ppp -direct pppoe
So yes... Exactly the same program, modules, and configuation works with the
rl drivers, but not with the ath drivers... I suppose now it is down to
being a driver issue???
--
Chris.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Gleb Smirnoff" <glebius@freebsd.org>
To: "Chris Knipe" <savage@savage.za.org>
Cc: <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
Sent: Monday, July 19, 2004 2:22 AM
Subject: Re: PPPoE misbehaving?
> On Mon, Jul 19, 2004 at 02:17:00AM +0200, Chris Knipe wrote:
> C> Thank you all for the replies. The card is a Senao NL-2054PCI, based
on the
> C> Atheros chipset... pciconf -lv reports:
> C>
> C> ath0@pci0:9:0: class=0x020000 card=0x2027168c chip=0x0013168c rev=0x01
> C> hdr=0x00
> C> vendor = 'Atheros Communications Inc.'
> C> device = '802/11b/g AR5212 wireless Adapter'
> C> class = network
> C> subclass = ethernet
> C>
> C> As I did indicate, the card is working and functioning properly - I am
99%
> C> sure it is a problem related with PPPoEd, or something in regards to
PPPoE
> C> over the Ethernet card (which, can also be possible I guess). I've
tried
> C> all the other suggestions that was made, and none of them seemed to
have
> C> changed anything. From what I can see, the client sends and attempts
to
> C> initiate the PPPoE connection properly, but the PPPoE daemon does not
> C> receive the packets / or does not initiate a session - which, needs to
be
> C> completed before any sub processes will be spawned.
>
> Try to activate this paragraph in ng_pppoe.c:
>
> #if 0
> #define AAA printf("pppoe: %s\n", __func__ );
> #define BBB printf("-%d-", __LINE__ );
> #else
> #define AAA
> #define BBB
> #endif
>
> I mean change "if 0" to "if 1". Then rebuild a new ng_pppoe.ko. Then
> try to connect, ensure that you see PADI's with tcpdump. And then
> report what do you have (or have not) logged on console.
>
> Thanks.
> C> for this. Are there possibly any other open source PPPoE Daemons
available
> C> that I can possibly try on FreeBSD 5.2??
>
> Seems like the issue is either with network driver or ng_pppoe, not with
> pppoed daemon.
>
> --
> Totus tuus, Glebius.
> GLEBIUS-RIPN GLEB-RIPE
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?001501c46d36$19078000$14e2fea9>