Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 6 Mar 2007 21:27:16 +0300
From:      "Artem Kuchin" <matrix@itlegion.ru>
To:        <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>, "Ivan Voras" <ivoras@fer.hr>
Subject:   Re: Some Unix benchmarks for those who are interesed
Message-ID:  <001a01c7601d$5d635ee0$0c00a8c0@Artem>
References:  <20070306020826.GA18228@nowhere><45ECF00D.3070101@samsco.org>	<20070306050312.GA2437@nowhere><008101c75fcc$210c74a0$0c00a8c0@Artem> <esk9vq$uhh$1@sea.gmane.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>Artem Kuchin wrote:
>> I used unixbenchmark for measure overall perfomance of three machines of
>> different generations and with different OS versions. See for your self and
>> compare results with machine cost.
>> Hope this will be usefull for someone.
>
>Several things:
>
>a) It looks like your message was weirdly truncated - whole "rectangles"
>of text are missing from the results on the right-hand-side. Maybe you
>copied it through Excel?

Ummm... hmmm.. i checked the message in the list, nothimng is missing.
Just like it was in the putty terminal from where i copied it.

>b) I submitted a patch for unixbench than enables execl benchmark on
>amd64, it should be in the ports tree by now.

oh! that's good. will retest.

>c) It would be interesting for the general discussion if you could
>install a recent server-like version of Linux (e.g. CentOS, SuSE,
>Debian) on one of the machines you did your benchmarks on to compare
>results :)


I am not good at linux, but this is an interesting idea. I'll try it. Which one
is easier to install?

--
Regards
Artem





Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?001a01c7601d$5d635ee0$0c00a8c0>