Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2004 20:55:51 +0800 From: "csj" <junsu@delphij.net> To: "Bruce M Simpson" <bms@spc.org>, <current@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Public Access to Perforce? Message-ID: <002701c48390$5f1d6df0$7302a8c0@fareast.corp.microsoft.com> References: <200408160104.03708.chris@behanna.org> <20040816060528.GA2065@empiric.icir.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
----- Original Message ----- From: "Bruce M Simpson" <bms@spc.org> Newsgroups: gmane.os.freebsd.current Cc: <current@freebsd.org> Sent: Monday, August 16, 2004 2:05 PM Subject: Re: Public Access to Perforce? > On Mon, Aug 16, 2004 at 01:04:03AM -0400, Chris BeHanna wrote: >> Is there a read-only account that the general public could use? > > I think this is an excellent idea. Perhaps one should be set up. Perforce license not only limits the user number but also the client number. I don't think a read-only account will work. > >> To alleviate load on perforce.freebsd.org, p4proxy could be set up >> on the current cvsup mirrors. I'd likely set up my own proxy server >> on my home box, just to improve local response time (and ease setting >> up a local vendor branch for playing around). > > Now I'm curious about doing this myself! It would certainly help on > my laptop. I am lagging behind on -CURRENT at the moment. > > BMS Jun
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?002701c48390$5f1d6df0$7302a8c0>