Date: Mon, 30 Dec 2002 21:28:47 -0800 From: "Brian" <bri@sonicboom.org> To: "Lowell Gilbert" <freebsd-questions-local@be-well.no-ip.com> Cc: "paul beard" <paulbeard@mac.com>, "BSD baby" <bsd@hitmedia.com>, <freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Re: do we have to wait for PHP 4.3 port? Message-ID: <002b01c2b08d$7eac8cf0$3224200a@me3> References: <20021230194818.A18495@mail.hitmedia.com><3E11152B.2050401@mac.com> <003d01c2b081$b5bedf10$3224200a@me3> <441y3y4ybi.fsf@be-well.ilk.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Because ports are really config files to obtain and install other peoples
software. Ports that would be deemed critical to system operation, like
perl, I could see freezing those. But all ports? BTW I'd love to see
sendmail and named removed from the installs and moved to ports/packages
only.
Bri
----- Original Message -----
From: "Lowell Gilbert" <freebsd-questions-local@be-well.no-ip.com>
To: "Brian" <bri@sonicboom.org>
Cc: "paul beard" <paulbeard@mac.com>; "BSD baby" <bsd@hitmedia.com>;
<freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Sent: Monday, December 30, 2002 8:17 PM
Subject: Re: do we have to wait for PHP 4.3 port?
> "Brian" <bri@sonicboom.org> writes:
>
> > hmm code freeze applies to ports as well, that is surprising.
>
> Why would it be surprising? They get shipped together, they need to
> be consistent with each other and verified to build at that time.
> It's just decent release engineering.
>
> To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
> with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
>
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?002b01c2b08d$7eac8cf0$3224200a>