Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2000 11:17:53 +0100 From: "Morten Seeberg" <ml@seeberg.dk> To: "The Hermit Hacker" <scrappy@hub.org>, "Charles Randall" <crandall@matchlogic.com> Cc: "Alfred Perlstein" <bright@wintelcom.net>, <freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Re: Need to compare FreeBSD -> Solaris 8 ... Message-ID: <005101bff621$99cb62a0$deff58c1@sos> References: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0007241856120.340-100000@thelab.hub.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > But, wouldn't you have to compare that with Solaris and the Veritas > > file system to be fair? > Nope, not in my opinion ... softupdates are part of the base operating > system, veritas isn't ... :) If softupdates are used, then the Solaris disk should have UFS logging enabled, then the test would be fair, because Solstice Disk Suite is free too. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?005101bff621$99cb62a0$deff58c1>