Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2005 20:43:09 +0200 From: "Chris Dionissopoulos" <dionch@freemail.gr> To: "Stephane Raimbault" <segr@hotmail.com>, <freebsd-pf@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: route-to rule. Message-ID: <005101c5030d$b98beb20$0100000a@R3B> References: <BAY24-F2071EB45E84817EF0AA2FCC860@phx.gbl>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi, For vpn problem: Is routing already set in both sides? pf-box: route add 10.0.0.0/26 <tun0_other_peer_IP> Other vpn end: route add 10.0.1.0/24 <tun0_pf_box_IP> For DNS problem: You have to decide which gateway pf-box will use as default for own connections (default gateway is missing). route add default <gw1> |<gw2> maybe solves it. Chris. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Stephane Raimbault" <segr@hotmail.com> To: <dionch@freemail.gr>; <freebsd-pf@freebsd.org> Sent: Tuesday, January 25, 2005 8:17 PM Subject: Re: route-to rule. > Well this is odd.. I gave this a try... and the tun interface wasn't able > to pass traffic between the 2 lan's > > 10.0.0.0/26 is the remote lan, and 10.1.0.0/24 is the local lan. > > and dns stopped working for the local lan... I have a caching dns server > configured on the pf box, and even that couldn't resolve anything despite > still having good network connections to the 2 wan's > > Any idea what's missing? > > Thanks, > sTephane. > ____________________________________________________________________ http://www.freemail.gr - δωρεάν υπηρεσία ηλεκτρονικού ταχυδρομείου. http://www.freemail.gr - free email service for the Greek-speaking.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?005101c5030d$b98beb20$0100000a>