Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 23:57:55 +1000 From: "Leigh V" <leighv@roq.com> To: <barbish@a1poweruser.com>, "FBSDQ" <questions@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Re: Alternative to NATD or IPNAT for cable connection. Message-ID: <006b01c27909$db37f7e0$2d01a8c0@michael> References: <MIEPLLIBMLEEABPDBIEGOEIDCNAA.barbish@a1poweruser.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
You can use my Ipfilter+Ipnat and DHCP setup script. Its designed for max security minimum fuss nat + stateful firewalling. And can also be just a start up firewall template for a tighter firewall setup. http://www.roq.com/bsd/ ----- Original Message ----- From: "JoeB" <barbish@a1poweruser.com> To: "FBSDQ" <questions@FreeBSD.ORG> Cc: "freebsd-isp@FreeBSD. ORG" <freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG> Sent: Sunday, October 20, 2002 11:03 PM Subject: Alternative to NATD or IPNAT for cable connection. > Help please, I looking for a software port that does NAT > (network address translation). Before getting cable I used user > PPP for dial up ISP with NAT function and then IPFW with > keep-state rules. This worked great because NAT was being done > outside of IPFW. Once I went to cable with DHCP I had to also go > to IPFW with NATD. NATD has problems with IPFW keep-state rules > where rules are mis-matched because of IPFW getting confused between > private and public ip address. > > Does anybody know of an stand-a-lone NAT program? > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?006b01c27909$db37f7e0$2d01a8c0>